AN UNBIASED VIEW OF COLLUSION BY CONTRACTORS CASE LAWS IN PAKISTAN

An Unbiased View of collusion by contractors case laws in pakistan

An Unbiased View of collusion by contractors case laws in pakistan

Blog Article

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It is actually well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is handy for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's arrived at to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's achieved these types of stage. Read more

limitation of liability for the extent of the cap provided via the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)

12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

R.O, Office, Gujranwala and the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade of your accused hasn't been conducted still. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to choose advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture on the petitioner was extensively circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity with the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance on the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly to the witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated images. Apart from, the images shown to the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity till he was place up for an identification parade. Making pictures of your accused publically, either by showing the same towards the witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or software, would create doubt within the proceedings on the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make sure that there is no likelihood with the witness to see the accused before going to the identification parade. The accused should not be shown to your witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the press or electronic media. Provided the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified from the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is perfectly-settled that though looking at the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to evaluate the merit of all the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of eligible candidates that are found to generally be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored from the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part from the respondent department.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.

after release from the jail he dropped interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )

When the petitioner is solely present at the place of incidence without causing any injury to your deceased or PWs then in these types of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided through the realized trial Court after recording with the evidence.

How much sway case legislation holds may possibly change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances from the current case. To discover this concept, evaluate the following case regulation definition.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its opportunity to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of those changes is important for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.

share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property might also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

Finding reliable free case legislation sites could be challenging. Several websites demand subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate check here the landscape of free case law resources in Pakistan, furnishing you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.

Report this page